Thursday, March 28, 2013

...and Deliver Us from Cool Parents, Amen.


Dear Philip:
I have a 17-year-old son, and while I’m sure he has tried pot, my husband and I have been very clear that we don’t approve of it and that there will be consequences if we catch him doing it.  We have let him have a beer at home with us on a few occasions, but we didn’t let him go out afterward.  We are not the strictest parents, but we are trying to help him respect the law and the danger that drugs and drinking can cause.
Here is our problem: one of his best friends has parents who allow the boys to drink at their house, as long as everyone is sleeping over.  The parents stay upstairs while the boys party in the basement.  (They even bought their sons a special “beer pong” table.)  We don’t approve, but we don’t want him to feel he has to sneak around on us in order to be with his friends, who are good kids.  What we’re really afraid of, though, is that it isn’t just drinking going on at that house. 
He argues that what those parents do is the same as what we do when we allow him a drink at home as long as he isn’t going to drive.  Is he right?
Uncertain but Trying

Dear Uncertain:
Seriously?  You’re worried your son may have a point?  I mean, I’ll cut him some slack, on two counts: he’s got a developing 17-year-old brain, which means reasoning probably isn’t his strong suit, and he really wants to party with his friends.  But what’s your excuse?
Of course what those folks do isn’t the same as what you do when it comes to alcohol.  You and your husband are parents.   They’re idiots.  And maybe something worse.
Let’s start with you, though:  I applaud your first paragraph, Uncertain.  You’re doing it right, where it comes to alcohol and drugs.  Though some might disagree, I’m all for allowing your son a beer every once in awhile, under your supervision.  In fact, Connecticut law says a minor can consume alcohol when accompanied by a parent.  When you think about it, what better way to take the mystique out of drinking?  What better way to guide your child – carefully – through the physical effects of alcohol? 
As to the pot, you’re likely being realistic when you say you suspect your son has tried it, but you’re also rightly holding a much firmer line at home: we don’t accept it, and if we find out about it, there will be serious, meaningful consequences.  You might try sitting your son down and explaining why you allow one in the home, and not the other.  Tell him about the effects pot can have on his growing cells, on his judgment, and on his future plans, if he’s arrested.  Tell him also about the incredibly dangerous lack of quality control, when it comes to illegal substances.
Once you’ve had that conversation, you might call his friend’s parents and explain a few things to them, too: like the fact that they can – and will – go to jail for providing alcohol to minors if that basement party gets loud enough to attract the police.  Ask them if they’ve considered the civil liability they’ll face if some drunk kid gets hurt (or hurts someone else) after boozing at their house…and ask if they seriously think kids aren’t coming and going from their basement, no matter how many times everyone promises to “sleep over.”
Of course, folks dumb enough to let their kids throw ragers while they keep out of the way might not understand the subtleties of common sense…and, in their fear of not seeming cool to their kids, they might get angry with you for even voicing concern.  In fact, I’d bet on it.  
So talk to your son, instead.  Tell him all the stuff you’d have said to them, and then add how angry it makes you that his friend’s folks have abdicated very basic parenting responsibilities and created a situation that puts him, his friends, and even themselves at great risk.
Tell him that you pray it won’t take a dead teen or a perp walk to straighten those foolish, selfish people out. 
Philip 

Thursday, March 14, 2013

Is It Time to Move On? Just Follow the Signs.


Dear Philip:
I was visiting my mother in Florida, and the weather report said that a storm was probably going to hit the Northeast on the day I was flying home.  The man I have been seeing for the past year texted to say, “You probably shouldn’t come home.”  When I called and told him that I was still going to try because we had made a dinner date to celebrate his birthday, he said not to worry because he had already made other plans.  He didn’t say with whom, and he didn’t mention a rain check for his birthday dinner.
Am I overreacting to be upset about this?  Up until the last month, he’s been very attentive, but he’s been distant lately, and the way he handled this was very cold.  What do you think?
Feeling Stranded

Dear Stranded:
Here’s what I think: Your ex-boyfriend is a jerk.  And I’m guessing that he is indeed your ex by the time you read this, whether you’ve accepted it yet or not.  Also?  Good riddance.
We boys can be tactless…but this seems beyond tactless, and heading firmly down the road toward contemptuous.  I’d be willing to overlook the stupid way he phrased his text to you – in other words, I’d be tempted to believe it was just badly stated concern – but for the fact that he took the further labor step of making other plans without first consulting you about your travel situation.
So no, Stranded, you’re not overreacting.  What you’re doing is noticing the very large signals he’s sending you.  The recent distance you’ve felt, coupled with the ham-handed way he casually broke your celebration plans, is a flashing neon sign which reads one of two things: it’s either “I have no problem taking you for granted,” or “I want out, and I lack a spine.”  Considering that, here’s my question to you:  does it really matter which of those messages he’s sending?
The good news is that you’re getting the chance to put him in your rearview now, and not after another year of dating.  Or two more.  Or a decade of marriage.  You’re getting an opportunity to peer into your future together, and I would hope that the preview would make you not want to stick around for what promises to be a dreary movie.
It’s not a virtue, Stranded, to single-handedly keep a relationship going long past the time it’s become clear that the person you’re seeing has lost interest.  It’s actually more of a curse, because that kind of willful ignorance keeps you from getting back out there and finding someone who will treat you with the respect you deserve; someone who warrants the regard with which you’ll treat them.
I’m a great believer in having certain standards, even – no, make that especially – when it comes to relationships.  I’m not so much talking about rules as I am about bare minimums: if you are willing to commit yourself to someone, to make them a priority in your life, then they need to reciprocate to the point where you feel sufficiently valued.  That means that if you sense you’ve fallen to the middle of their to-do list, you’re gone.  That means that your self-respect is strong enough to tell you when it’s time to move on.
Think for a moment about what you bring to a relationship.  Think about how much time, effort, and love you’re willing to give to the person you’d like to have as a partner.  What do you think those things are worth?  What do you think you merit in return?  It’s a safe bet that you deserve a heck of a lot more than Mr. Don’t-Come-Home, I-Made-Other-Plans.  In fact here’s your new mantra:  “I am worthy of someone who would swim across the Rhine under enemy fire for me.”  Don’t settle for less…especially after a year of dating, you know?
Kick the jerk to the curb, Stranded, and know this: the loss is entirely his.
Fly safe!
Philip